How Much of Rome Did Nero Burn?

By Robert Palmer

How Much of Rome Did Nero Burn?

When it comes to infamous rulers in history, Nero is often near the top of the list. One of the most enduring rumors surrounding Nero is that he set fire to Rome, resulting in widespread destruction.

But just how much of Rome did Nero burn? Let’s delve into the historical record to uncover the truth.

The Great Fire of Rome

In 64 AD, a devastating fire swept through Rome, leaving destruction in its wake. The fire raged for six days and seven nights, reducing entire neighborhoods to ashes. It was a disaster of epic proportions that sent shockwaves throughout the city.

But did Nero really start the fire?

There is no concrete evidence to suggest that Nero intentionally started the fire. In fact, several ancient sources refute this claim. The Roman historian Tacitus stated that rumors had spread accusing Nero, but he believed these accusations were unfounded.

The Blame Game

However, while it seems unlikely that Nero was responsible for starting the fire, some historians argue that he took advantage of the situation to further his own agenda.

Nero saw an opportunity in the aftermath of the fire: a chance to rebuild Rome according to his own vision. He seized control of vast areas devastated by flames and began constructing his opulent Domus Aurea (Golden House).

The Aftermath

The Great Fire of Rome caused immense suffering and left countless Romans homeless. To deflect blame from himself, Nero Targeted a group often marginalized in society: Christians. He accused them of starting the fire and subjected them to cruel punishments.

  • Torture: Christians were subjected to various forms of torture as punishment for their alleged role in the fire. This included being burned alive, crucified, and torn apart by wild animals.
  • Blame: Nero’s scapegoating of Christians set a dangerous precedent, leading to widespread persecution of Christians throughout the Roman Empire.

The Verdict

In conclusion, while Nero did not directly start the Great Fire of Rome, he certainly exploited the situation to his advantage. His actions afterward, including persecuting Christians and constructing his extravagant Golden House, tarnished his legacy forever.

So how much of Rome did Nero burn?

The answer is none. However, his response to the fire and its aftermath left an indelible mark on both Rome’s history and his own reputation.

References:

  • Tacitus. “Annals. “
  • Suetonius. “The Twelve Caesars.

  • Cassius Dio. “Roman History. “