Was Rome Called Saturnia?

By Alice Nichols

Many people wonder about the origins of ancient Rome and its name. One theory suggests that Rome was originally called Saturnia, named after the Roman god Saturn. Let’s explore this hypothesis in more detail.

The Myth of Saturnia

In Roman mythology, Saturn was an important deity associated with agriculture and abundance. He was believed to have ruled over a golden age in which people lived in peace and harmony. The city of Rome, according to legend, was founded during this mythical era.

Some scholars argue that the early Romans referred to their city as Saturnia in honor of their revered deity. They believe that this name later evolved into the familiar name we know today as Rome.

Evidence Supporting the Theory

While there is no definitive proof that Rome was originally called Saturnia, there are several pieces of evidence that support this theory.

  • Linguistic Similarities: The Latin word for Saturday, “dies Saturni,” derives from the name of the god Saturn. This linguistic connection implies a historical association between the city and the deity.
  • Ancient Texts: Some ancient texts mention Rome as Saturnia or even refer to its inhabitants as “Saturnians.”

    These writings provide some support for the theory that Rome had an earlier name related to Saturn.

  • Archaeological Discoveries: Archaeologists have unearthed artifacts and inscriptions suggesting a strong religious cult dedicated to Saturn in early Rome. These findings indicate a significant connection between the city and its alleged original name.

The Counterarguments

Despite these pieces of evidence, not all historians agree with the theory that Rome was once called Saturnia. Some counterarguments include:

  • Historical Inconsistencies: The theory relies heavily on ancient texts, which can sometimes be contradictory or prone to embellishment. Historians caution against taking these accounts at face value.
  • Evolution of Names: It is common for place names to change over time due to linguistic evolution or political influences.

    Rome may simply be the result of such changes, rather than a direct evolution from Saturnia.

  • Lack of Concrete Evidence: While the linguistic connections and religious artifacts are intriguing, they do not provide definitive proof that Rome was once known as Saturnia. Without concrete evidence, the theory remains speculative.

The Verdict

In conclusion, while the theory that Rome was originally called Saturnia is plausible and supported by certain linguistic and archaeological evidence, it remains a subject of debate among historians. Without conclusive proof, we can only speculate about the true origins of Rome’s name. Nevertheless, exploring such theories adds depth to our understanding of ancient civilizations and the richness of their mythology.