What Did Nero Do While Rome Burned?
During the Great Fire of Rome in 64 AD, the city was engulfed in flames for six days and seven nights. The fire caused widespread devastation, destroying a significant portion of the city and leaving countless Romans homeless. In the midst of this calamity, one question that has intrigued historians for centuries is: What did Emperor Nero do while Rome burned?
The Fiddling Myth
One popular myth surrounding Nero’s actions during the fire is that he stood atop a hill, playing his fiddle (or lyre) as he watched the city burn. This image of an indifferent and callous emperor has been perpetuated in literature and popular culture. However, there is no historical evidence to support this claim.
Nero’s Efforts to Control the Fire
Contrary to the fiddling myth, Nero took immediate action to control the fire and provide relief to those affected. He opened up his own gardens and public buildings to accommodate displaced citizens. Additionally, he ordered his soldiers to assist with firefighting efforts.
- The Creation of Fire Brigades: Recognizing the need for organized firefighting efforts, Nero established a corps of firefighters known as the “vigiles.” These vigiles were tasked with patrolling the streets at night to prevent fires and respond quickly when one broke out.
- Rebuilding Efforts: After the fire was extinguished, Nero personally financed reconstruction projects and implemented building regulations to prevent future fires.
Nero’s Golden House
After most of Rome had been destroyed by the fire, Nero seized this opportunity to build his grand palace complex known as Domus Aurea, or the Golden House. This extravagant project covered a vast area of the city and was adorned with lavish decorations and artworks.
Public Perception and Blame
Despite Nero’s efforts to control the fire and rebuild Rome, his reputation suffered greatly in the aftermath. Rumors circulated that he had intentionally started the fire to make room for his new palace, which further fueled resentment towards him.
Ultimately, Nero would go down in history as a despotic ruler who played a role in the decline of the Roman Empire. The Great Fire of Rome served as a turning point in his reign, marking the beginning of his downfall.
In conclusion, while Nero may not have fiddled while Rome burned, his actions during and after the fire were significant. He took steps to control the fire, provided relief to those affected, and initiated rebuilding efforts. However, his reputation was marred by rumors and public perception, leading to a tarnished legacy.