Who Was Blamed for the Great Fire of London?

By Michael Ferguson

The Great Fire of London is one of the most devastating disasters in the history of England. The fire that broke out on September 2, 1666, destroyed a major part of the city and left thousands homeless. It took several days to control the fire, and it caused widespread panic and chaos among the people.

But who was to blame for this catastrophe? The blame game started soon after the fire was extinguished, and several theories were put forth to explain its cause.

Thomas Farriner

The most common theory was that Thomas Farriner, a baker by profession, was responsible for starting the fire. He owned a bakery on Pudding Lane where the fire reportedly started. According to some accounts, Farriner forgot to put out his oven before going to bed, which led to the outbreak of fire.

However, there is no concrete evidence to support this theory. Moreover, Farriner had an impeccable reputation as a skilled baker and a responsible citizen who had served as a member of the Worshipful Company of Bakers for over 20 years.

Foreigners

Another theory that gained traction at the time was that foreigners were responsible for starting the fire. Anti-foreigner sentiment was high in England during that period due to ongoing conflicts with other European nations.

Some people believed that French or Dutch immigrants had started the fire as an act of revenge against England. However, this theory lacked evidence and was fueled more by prejudice than fact.

Catholics

A third theory blamed Catholics for starting the Great Fire of London. At that time, England was predominantly Protestant, and there were deep-seated tensions between these two religious groups.

Some people believed that Catholics had conspired with foreign powers to burn down London as part of a plot to overthrow King Charles II and reinstate Catholicism in England.

This theory gained wide acceptance among certain sections of the society, and many Catholics were persecuted and falsely accused of starting the fire. However, there is no evidence to suggest that Catholics had any role in the outbreak of the fire.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while there were several theories about who was to blame for the Great Fire of London, none of them have been conclusively proven. It is likely that a combination of factors such as dry weather conditions, wooden buildings, and narrow streets contributed to the rapid spread of fire.

The Great Fire of London was a tragedy that changed the face of the city forever. It led to new building regulations and paved the way for modern firefighting techniques. While we may never know exactly what caused the fire, it is important to remember those who lost their lives and homes in this catastrophic event.